Teamwork and Communication in the Perioperative Environment
Jacqueline Hannan, PhD
Issue 3 | Volume 2 | August 2026
Modern perioperative care depends on high-functioning interdisciplinary teams. Every surgical procedure requires close coordination among anesthesiologists, surgeons, nurses, perfusionists, surgical technologists, and trainees, all working together in a dynamic environment where patient conditions can change rapidly. While technical expertise is essential, communication and teamwork are equally critical determinants of patient safety. Numerous studies have shown that communication failures contribute to preventable adverse events, making effective teamwork a core clinical skill rather than simply a professional courtesy.
Anesthesia professionals occupy a unique position within the operating room. Unlike other team members whose focus may shift throughout a procedure, anesthesia clinicians maintain continuous responsibility for monitoring the patient’s physiologic status while coordinating care across disciplines. This systems-level perspective allows anesthesiologists to recognize emerging problems early, communicate evolving risks, and facilitate coordinated responses when unexpected events occur.
One of the most important communication strategies in the operating room is closed-loop communication. In closed-loop communication, the sender delivers a clear message, the receiver acknowledges and repeats the information, and the sender confirms that the message was understood correctly. Rather than saying, “Can someone give phenylephrine?,” an anesthesiologist might direct, “Joe, please administer 100 micrograms of phenylephrine.” The nurse responds, “Giving 100 micrograms of phenylephrine.” Although this process requires only a few extra seconds, it greatly reduces the likelihood of misunderstanding, particularly during high-workload situations or emergencies.
Communication also extends beyond crisis management. Routine discussions regarding anticipated blood loss, changes in surgical approach, patient positioning, antibiotic timing, anticoagulation management, and emergence planning allow the entire team to maintain a shared mental model of the case. Teams that continuously update one another are better equipped to anticipate future needs rather than simply reacting to problems after they occur. This proactive communication supports coordinated decision-making and improves overall workflow efficiency.
Anesthesia professionals also play an important role in fostering psychological safety within the operating room. Psychological safety refers to an environment in which every team member feels comfortable voicing concerns, asking questions, or identifying potential errors without fear of embarrassment or retaliation. In healthcare, where hierarchy has traditionally been strong, creating psychological safety is essential for patient safety. Junior residents, student nurse anesthetists, circulating nurses, or perfusionists may recognize subtle safety threats before others. Encouraging all team members to speak up helps identify hazards before they result in patient harm.
Speaking up can be particularly challenging when raising concerns to senior clinicians or during stressful situations. Structured communication tools can help overcome these barriers. Frameworks such as SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation) provide standardized language that allows clinicians to escalate concerns clearly while maintaining professionalism. Consistent use of these strategies reinforces a culture in which patient safety takes precedence over hierarchy
Safe patient care also depends on effective handoffs, which represent periods of increased vulnerability. Information may be transferred during shift changes, relief breaks, transport to the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), or admission to the intensive care unit. Incomplete or inaccurate handoffs have been associated with communication errors, delays in treatment, and adverse patient outcomes. High-quality handoffs include: not only the patient’s current condition, but also critical contextual information such as airway management, vascular access, medications administered, intraoperative events, anticipated postoperative concerns, contingency plans should complications arise. Standardized handoff protocols and checklists improve consistency and reduce the risk that important information is omitted.
Although technical proficiency remains a cornerstone of anesthesiology practice, the specialty increasingly recognizes that nontechnical skills, such as communication, leadership, situation awareness, and decision-making, are equally important contributors to patient outcomes. These skills are routinely practiced through simulation-based education, crew resource management training, and interdisciplinary team exercises. Such training emphasizes that effective communication is a learned clinical skill that requires deliberate practice and continuous refinement.
Ultimately, anesthesia professionals serve not only as physiologic experts, but also as coordinators of perioperative teamwork. Through clear closed-loop communication, proactive information sharing, willingness to speak up, and structured handoffs, anesthesia clinicians help create a culture in which every member of the perioperative team contributes to safe patient-centered care. As health care continues to grow in complexity, these teamwork and communication skills will remain fundamental components of high-quality anesthesia practice.
REFERENCES
- Flin R, O’Connor P, Crichton M. Safety at the Sharp End: A Guide to Non-Technical Skills. Ashgate; 2008.
- Speth J. (2024). Guidelines in Practice: Team Communication. AORN journal, 120(1), 31–38. https:// doi.org/10.1002/aorn.14161
- Das, S., Vasudevan, A., Nieves-Rivera, A., Edwards, H.A. and Spence, N.Z., 2024. Perceptions about perioperative communication among anesthesiologists and surgeons and the impact of perceived status hierarchies on teamwork in the operating room. JCA Advances, 1(3-4), p.100012.
- Mazzocco K, Petitti DB, Fong KT, et al. Surgical team behaviors and patient outcomes. Am J Surg. 2009;197(5):678-685.
- Sexton JB, Helmreich RL, Neilands TB, et al. The Safety Attitudes Questionnaire: psychometric properties, benchmarking data, and emerging research. BMC Health Serv Res. 2006;6:44.